Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Assad Denies Fool Play But US Intelligence Has Evidence


 
The truth is out as reported by the United Nations Security Council, Bashar al-Assad killed thousands of his own people in hopes of blaming it on the rebels.


The UN's conclusions are solely based off Assad's inability to denounce these allegations against him and his regime. When interviewed by Charlie Rose just this week Assad stated, "We will have to agree to disagree about whether I killed my fellow Syrian's in order to blame the rebels and garner international support to fight the terrorists out of my country."


The truth started to unfold just today as Obama pushed the international community across the red line which he drew just weeks before. On a side note, the UN Chamber of Reasoning is still trying to determine what that red line signified.


In the US's internal investigation and NSA's secret data collection on Syrian citizens and its government the conclusions were unanimous, Syrian people were dieing by the thousands. When the newly appointed Obamacare Investigative Unit took a closer look at the evidence it was clear to them there was fool play.


Turns out after further forensics testing on pictures and video footage of the diseased Syrians, the source of the death and destruction came from chemical jelly beans. We can thank Alan Grayson for leaking this information from the closed briefings on Syria's fool play. In these leaked classified documents are the details of the US's findings.


The US has concluded that these jelly beans were injected with mustard gas, making the bodies turn yellow once they pass, and then distributing them via humanitarian relief through the Red Cross. The Red Cross states it was 99.8% unaware that the thousands of yellow jelly beans the Assad regime gave them were laced with mustard gas.


As the world sits back and watches Assad amass these chemical weapons, thanks to satellite imagery from US intelligence agencies, the US is making plans to nuke these compounds. Obama has publicly endorsed nuking Syria to show the world that chemical warfare will not be tolerated by the US or the international community.


As this information unfolds has your mind been changed on the facts and details of the Assad regimes merciless killing of its own people through means of chemical warfare? Should the US nuke Syria to stop Assad from killing his own people? Make sure congress knows your thoughts and opinions before they vote on the attack this week.

Best new sources to get accurate information on the Syrian Civil War developments;
http://benswann.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/SyrianGirlpartisan
http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/
http://www.dailypaul.com/
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.tytnetwork.com/
http://www.democracynow.org/

7 comments:

  1. Looking forward to your comments and thoughts on my very first post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're off to a good start. The layout, background and theme make a good first impression and the overall design grabs my attention. The way you structured the article and how you put the pictures in is good. And I like the last section with the questions. It grabs my attention and the larger font switches things up and gives the page action. And the section with the links to the news sources is original. In all it's a good creative article and I can tell a lot of hard work went into it especially for your very first blog.

      Delete
  2. I wish everyone would agree to a few rules for the WWW:

    1) If you don't have an original idea or feel absolutely certain that your unoriginal blog is going to be amongst the cream of the crop in a specific "genre", don't launch a blog.

    2) If you can't spell or don't know how to use spell-check software, or if you don't have a decent grasp on punctuation, don't launch a blog.

    3) Unless a bunch of people outside your family and close friends (people who don't care enough about you to lie in order to make you feel good about yourself) tell you that you're witty, clever, unique, a good writer, etc., don't launch a blog.

    This "article" would be right at home as a user post on The Blaze or some shit. It's not "I should start my very own blog" quality material, my friend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you think my content and idea is unoriginal?

      And what misspellings are there?

      And the reason I started this blog for your information is because none of my friends like to talk politics nor my family members so instead of keeping my thoughts bottled up I chose this.

      I know my writings not the best, my vocabulary isn't great and yes I may misspell things time to time but is that not human?

      You want to be my editor in chief, please feel free! I need it.

      But I see this endeavor as a work in progress to tone my writing capabilities, get my thoughts out, and to hear what other peoples perspectives are on the issues (not on my blogging ability) but I take your thoughts into consideration.

      Delete
    2. Ignore him. Some people are just miserable and feel better by taking out their insecurities on other people. He's got so little to do with his time he actually wrote out a 3-point comment on a blog he doesn't like, most likely to discourage competition from his own crappy blog that no one likes.

      Keep it up and don't let people discourage you. Blogging is one of the best ways to improve your writing.

      Delete
    3. malloy73 just devoted 20 minutes of his precious time to shitting all over this article. what a silly way to give someone a compliment.

      Delete
  3. Any thoughts on the media war Obama is waging on Syria??

    How are the neocons backing this, MSM backing this and the Obama's stump speeches for this and still the American public opinion of the whole thing is extraordinarily LOW!

    After all of this an we still aren't convinced! So will Obama still take us to war regardless??

    ReplyDelete